顯示具有 news 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 news 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2008年4月30日 星期三

閱讀困難症 中英文有別

國家科學院彙報網路版7日公布的研究指出,根據從小閱讀英文或中文,閱讀困難症(dyslexia)影響兒童不同的大腦部位。這項發現可能意味治療師需尋求不同方法,以協助來自不同文化的兒童。
研究主要作者、香港大學語言學教授譚力海表示,過去研究顯示大腦對不同語言可能使用不同的神經細胞網路,但從未顯示大腦部位的結構不同。
研究員發現,使用字母(例如英文)的閱讀困難症兒童,其大腦造影顯示在以下區域有不尋常的功能與結構:與字母轉成聲音有關的左顳頂區(left temporo-parietal areas);與語音分析有關的左中上顳葉皮質(leftmiddle-superior temporal cortex);可能具有迅速辨認字形系統功用的左下顳枕腦迴(left inferior temporo-occipital gyrus)。
但對有閱讀困難症的中國小朋友進行類似造影研究發現,受影響的是不同區域:左中額葉腦迴(left middle frontal gyrus)
閱讀像英文的字母語言與閱讀中文所需的技巧不同,中文較不依賴聲音表徵,而是使用符號來代表字詞。例如說英語的兒童學習字母的聲音和如何結合字母形成詞彙,中國兒童則默記數百個代表字詞的符號。
譚力海指出,研究顯示治療說中文的閱讀困難症患者,也許可使用工作記憶任務和與感覺運動技能有關的測驗,目前治療說英語的閱讀困難症患者,則著重於字母轉成聲音和音韻覺識(sound awareness)。
【2008/04/08 世界日報】

2008年4月16日 星期三

Butter shortage in Japan.

MD 沒時間看....
先po在這邊. 有空的同學看過後請回應!!!
都瞎~~~

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article3746900.ece

Related news in Chinese
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/080416/2/xefp.html

From
April 15, 2008

Japan is a market pioneer again: the first industrialised nation with no butter

An explosion in grain prices and a slide away from self-sufficiency is causing global crisis. And wealth is no guarantee of insulation

The manager of the Z-one supermarket, five minutes from Prada’s flagship store and in the heart of Tokyo’s chicest residential area, shrugs her shoulders and suggests margarine.

Japan, she says apologetically, has nearly exhausted its butter reserves. When the shop will next have any, she whispers, is anybody’s guess.

Even as the elderly shopkeeper explains the acute national butter shortage, she can barely believe her own words: Japanese farmers who once scoffed at the low prices of imported cattle feed have been crippled by the global rise in grain prices.

And a rich country that has not gone without anything it wanted on its plate for 35 years is suddenly panicking about food security.

Decades of urbanisation, complacency about food, burgeoning imports and dwindling self-sufficiency were once proud boasts. Suddenly, they look like liabilities. Japan, say analysts, is emerging as a useful proxy for what the food crisis could mean for developed economies because it has gone further down the road of reliance on global food markets — markets that now threaten to deliver turmoil.

To developing Asia — China and India particularly — Japan’s history of industrialisation offers solid clues about what will happen to food demand as meat-eating middle classes spring from an expanding economy. Chinese eat twice as much meat — 50kg (110lb) per year — as they did in the 1980s. Japan made that leap half a century ago.

For other developed nations, Japan’s reaction to global food shortages will illustrate what happens to a country whose population has far outgrown its farmland’s ability to support, whose agricultural population is elderly and disaffected, whose food self-sufficency rates are low, but whose palates have grown accustomed to exotic imports.

It has also demonstrated that the pressures driving world food prices higher can hit large, consolidated industries as hard as small Thai or Haitian farmers.

Once-reliable assumptions, such as that Japan was the export destination of choice for many food-producing countries, have evaporated in a new reality of ferocious competition between buyers.

More shocking than the — probably fairly brief — butter shortages is the speed with which catastrophe has struck an institution so old and well organised as the Japanese dairy industry. Just two years ago, Japan’s spring milk glut was so embarrassing that 1,000 tonnes were poured down the drain and farmers were forced to stand outside railway stations in Hokkaido handing out free cartons to passers-by.

Some dairies looked into ways to convert milk into burnable natural gas, there was simply so much of the white stuff.

Since then, Australian milk imports have fallen because of the country’s three-year drought and feed is much more expensive because grain prices have soared across the world.

Wealthy Japan faces low risk of starvation, food rioting or any of the associated social unrest which threaten much of the developing world. Japan’s people can absorb food price rises for the time being.

But Japan’s butter shortages have exposed an alarming effect of what economists at Goldman Sachs describe as the long-term, “structural” shift towards higher food prices currently being felt: that many of the existing arrangements crafted by wealthier nations to feed their populations are now in peril.

Japan, its leading food importers say, will inevitably take a step backwards in the food it eats. “The time will come,” says Akio Shibata, the director of the Marubeni Institute and one of Japan’s foremost experts on food supply, “when the Japanese people will realise that they will not have the quality, taste and prices of food they are used to.”

At the root of the problem, not just for Japan, is the historic diminution of the world’s wheat and corn inventories. It is a situation, says Michael Lewis, head of commodities research at Deutsche Bank, which “shows how precarious a system can become when inventories get low and the sensitivity to price spikes explodes”.

With only a month’s worth of corn and wheat inventories remaining, the world’s food system has lost its cushion. And wealth does not guarantee insulation.

So even as Tokyo’s restaurants celebrate their world-beating haul of Michelin stars, a government survey found last week that 40 per cent of Japanese are dismayed by a deterioration in the quality of their food.

Takashi Hagemura is not surprised. Where once the world was a buyer’s market for a strong yen, Japan has fallen victim, says the owner of the Ren noodle restaurant in Shibuya, to movements in global food markets over which it no longer has any real control. China’s growing middle class has developed a taste for coffee that has created a demand on a scale that the old market was barely prepared for.

Vietnamese farmers, quick to spot a cash crop that they could readily produce in bulk, diverted their activities to coffee growing and, inadvertently, slashed their exports of the pepper that used to be grown on the same land. Pepper prices, as charged to noodle restaurants in Tokyo, have surged by nearly 80 per cent and, desperate to keep his prices competitive, Mr Hagemura now, regretfully, puts less into his noodle soup.

[Fwd]: China Demographic Crisis: Too Many Boys, Elderly

A news to share from NPR World

China Demographic Crisis: Too Many Boys, Elderly

Morning Edition, April 14, 2008 · It has been three decades since China's one-child policy was introduced as a temporary measure to slow the country's population growth. But there's rising opposition to the policy amid criticism that it's creating another demographic crisis.

The trends are exemplified in the city of Shanghai, which has the lowest birth rate and the highest proportion of seniors in China.

As two-year-old Maomao and her 10-month-old brother Lulu play in a Shanghai park, little do they realize they're a departure from three decades of strict family planning. Although many rural Chinese have two children, China still limits most urban families to just one child.

Because Maomao and Lulu's parents are both only-children themselves, they're among the privileged few city dwellers allowed to have two kids.

"I was lonely as a child," says their mother Zara, who didn't want her full name to be used. "I was jealous of friends who had brothers and sisters. Now my friends are envious of my two children."

Figures bear this out: A poll last year showed 69 percent of Chinese would support a proposal to abolish the one-child policy.

Zara has come to the park with her mother-in-law, and her 81-one-year-old mother-in-law. All of them support China's efforts to control its population.

"Our leaders have thought a lot about the country's policies," the 81-year-old matriarch says. "Whatever they say is right."

'Abnormal' Sex Ratio at Birth

However, demographic scholars aren't so sure. Some academics now believe the simplistic thinking behind the one-child policy could be responsible for a looming demographic crisis.

Among them is Peng Xizhe, dean of social development and public policy at Fudan University.

"The major policymakers are only concerned about the total number of the population," he says. "But now China's population dynamic has become so complicated. On the one hand, the number is still growing. Then we have the very rapidly aging population. Then we have the issues of big migration. And also we face the problem of the abnormal sex ratio at birth."

That abnormal sex ratio means little Lulu might not find a wife, along with as many as 40 million other young men. The latest figures show 119 baby boys are born in China for every 100 girls — far above the normal ratio of between 103 and 107 boys per 100 girls — because of the traditional preference for boys and the availability of abortion.

Economic Consequences

The strict birth control policies have serious economic consequences too.

China's limited labor pool and its aging population means it will eventually lose its position as workshop of the world, says Zuo Xuejin, executive vice president of Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences. He says the demographic trend is making China less competitive in labor-intensive manufacturing than India, Bangladesh and other countries.

Indeed the future of the one-child policy was a hot topic at this year's session of China's parliament. But speculation that changes might be in the offing ended when Population Minister Zhang Weiqing said the policy would stay in place for another decade.

The academics say that's a mistake.

"It's better to just let families decide how many children they want," Peng Xizhe says.

Zuo Xuejin, of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, says fertility "is a very basic right of citizens" that should not be interfered with.

One reason why they believe people should take control of their own fertility is China's rapidly aging elderly population.

'No One Will Take Care of Me'

In the Shanghai park, seniors far outnumber children; a staggering 20 percent of the city's population is older than 60. Longer life expectancy and the one-child policy mean fewer workers are supporting ever more seniors. And the disintegration of a state-run social security network means many seniors now fear a lonely future.

"I worry when I'm old no one will take care of me," says Wang Jintao. "At that time, I think my life will become very terrible. Our government never worried about that."

Wang is a teacher of the erhu — a traditional two-stringed instrument similar to a violin played balanced on the knee. As he prepares for his weekly class in the park with a group of seniors, he believes he's voicing the fears of an entire generation.

"Thirty years ago, our government made a mistake," he says. "The result is in big cities, most of the people my age, they're worried about their future."

China is now galloping towards its aging future. Experts are warning the danger is not in changing the one-child policy too soon — it's in moving too late.


2007年12月10日 星期一

A follow-on reading on Kosovo and also a link to the politics in Taiwan

在讀完上篇跟Kosovo獨立有關的報導, 會對Kosovo有興趣也是因為這學期室友的關係, 不禁讓我想在網上查詢對於 Slobodan Milosevic(米洛捨維奇,前南斯拉夫塞族領導人)這個獨裁者更多的報導. 於是在尋找中, 在明見找到下列的報導http://xinsheng.net/xs/articles/big5/2005/7/12/33174.htm

其實我所找到得是一篇稍有年代的報導,不過上面的訊息仍然十分充足.

最令我感興趣的,其實是那篇報導開頭的前半部:

【明見網7月12日訊】國際時事作家彼得.維古立思(Peter Zvagulis)為英文大紀元撰稿,結合歷史事實談中共對法輪功的仇恨宣傳,他指出中共對法輪功的捕風捉影之術,和前蘇聯的做法相似。他說,“共產政權 隨心所欲的玩著仇恨宣傳遊戲;它們根據需要援用或無視普世接受的規則或國際法;它們創造假想敵,以轉移人民對它們錯誤的注意力。”

我看到這一點,第一個想到得就是在台灣的政治角力. 尤其是這一陣子在中正紀念堂的軒然大波.
Cuz that is really just totally insane!! 仇恨宣傳真的是十分恐怖的工具, 難不成陳水扁也把台灣的社會大眾當成共產制度下的愚民在愚弄嗎? 所以他們才要把蔣公舉出來,把仇很具體化, 雖然打著和平共處的標語,但卻無不盡其所能的挑起社會大眾之間的仇恨與對立.大好喜功的積極"正名",企圖轉移大眾對於其政績貧乏的失望, 內閣團隊及其個部會粗暴的政治語言和行為, 不禁讓人錯愕: "咱們這下真的是舉寇為王了嗎?"

我很高興目前大家對於近來的舉動較為冷靜了(但也許是因為心冷了而無奈? ). 但更要沉著的觀察, 冷靜的批判; 政治是一件很難不個人化的事物. (媽呀你英文式中文還可以再過份一點!!)
一個人對於公眾事務的熱情會很難讓你完全的置身事外, 但很多時候, 個人的情緒要是能少一點, 其實對於追求公眾的利益會是更有幫助的.
(媽的 好爛的結論唷, 哮咦馨, 削鉛筆芯, 你真的還可以再八股一點!!)

好, 回去寫我寫不完的ob journal. darn the motha focker.

Countdown to Kosovan independence

A news that I read from the BBC.
It sort of making me into thinking, would this apply to where I came from?.

Time for the finals. Talk more later.

Tchuess!
Mel


Countdown to Kosovan independence
By Allan Little
BBC News

Kosovo could be independent from Serbia early next year, following the collapse of talks over its future, and despite opposition from Belgrade and Moscow.

KFOR troops in Mitrovica
K-For troops have been stationed in potential flashpoints in Kosovo
The timetable is now clear. There will be no hasty unilateral declaration of independence this week. But it will be soon: probably in January.

It is all being carefully co-ordinated with Kosovo's pro-independence allies - the United States, Britain, France, and Germany.

They will recognise the new state quickly, open diplomatic relations, exchange ambassadors. Serbia will refuse to recognise it and will be supported by Russia, which is hostile to breakaway regions within its own borders.

Kosovo is where it all began, 20 years ago. Yugoslavia's bloody disintegration, the descent into barbarism, the coining of a grim new euphemism to add to the lexicon of conflict: "ethnic cleansing".

This is where Slobodan Milosevic established himself as the champion of the Serbian nation.

'Famous battle'

He stood in front of a crowd of a million Serbs at a rally to mark the anniversary of the battle of Kosovo in 1389 - the battle in which the Serbs were defeated by the Turks - and rallied the nation to what he said was a new fight for national survival.

The legend of 1389 has given Kosovo a mythical, almost mystical significance in Serbian nationalism.

It is also - appropriately - the place from which Milosevic launched what was to be a series of wars - in Slovenia, in Croatia, in Bosnia, and finally Kosovo itself.

Kosovan students in Pristina
Kosovan hopes for independence could be realised in 2008

The arc of Milosevic's life reads like a character written by Goethe. There was something Faustian in the pact he made with the twin demons of Balkan nationalism and war.

They kept him in power for a while. War was his power base. But they destroyed him in the end.

'Disastrous experiment'

And now the Serbs - and Serbia itself - are paying the price of that disastrous experiment in ethnic supremacy.

I remember them at their hubristic high water mark. The territories held by the Serbs swept across the western Balkans, observing no legal frontiers.

All of Serbia, including Kosovo, all of Montenegro, two thirds of independent Bosnia, one third of Croatia they held.

I was there the day they unfurled the maps of the state they proclaimed as Greater Serbia: bearded men in World War Two uniforms of the Serbian royalist Chetnik forces, self-consciously atavistic, fighting and killing and dying to avenge an injustice that had begun in the 14th Century.

All the Serb lands west of the Drina River were to be renamed Western Serbia.

Wars in the Balkans do not happen spontaneously. They have to be planned, organised, funded, resourced, armed, equipped, guided

Serbia would now stretch to the gleaming Adriatic at the Croatian port of Zadar.

And the non-Serbs whose homes are on those territories, who have been driven out, ethnically cleansed, we asked. What was to become of them?

Frankly, they did not give a damn.

There was an old nationalist song they used to sing.

"Who dares say it, who dares tell the lie, that Serbia is small?" they sang.

"It is not small, it is not small".

Well it is small now. First the Serbs lost their territories in Croatia. Then the Serbs in Bosnia - under immense military and diplomatic pressure - agreed to be part of an independent Bosnian state.

Serb identity

Even Montenegro abandoned them. And finally, now, the cradle of Serbian national identity, Kosovo.

There was a time when a declaration of independence would have plunged this region back into full scale war.

Will it this time? Few here think so.

And here's why. Wars in the Balkans do not happen spontaneously. They have to be planned, organised, funded, resourced, armed, equipped, guided.

Slobodan Milosevic
Slobodan Milosevic's rallying of Serb nationalism began in Kosovo

Milosevic threw the weight of the entire state behind the effort of the 1990s. It was a huge mobilisation.

There is no state in the Balkans ready or able to make that sacrifice now.

Serbia is in no condition to launch an invasion to retake Kosovo by force.

Even if it were, it is doubtful that Serbian public opinion would, this time, walk hand in hand with the project.

Serbia will be angry and resentful - but most Serbs now want to get on with the business of becoming a normal European country.

Criminal haven

Britain and America have become the most important sponsors of independence, because they think that without it there can be no economic progress, and without economic progress, Kosovo will continue its dangerous slide into criminality.

It is already a haven for drug smuggling and people trafficking - a headache that is felt across the European Union and beyond.

One pro-independence Western diplomat here likened the situation to Northern Ireland.

Map of Serbia and Kosovo

"Your Paddy Ashdown," he said, referring to the former International High Representative in Bosnia. "Your Paddy Ashdown put it well when he said that there were some nations who forfeited the moral authority to govern - the moral claim to sovereignty - simply by dint of their own actions. That was true of the British in Ireland 80 years ago. It's true of Serbia's historic claim to Kosovo now," he said.

But there could be consequences, the most important of these in Bosnia.

'Violent unravelling'

Bosnia remains territorially divided under the terms of a peace treaty that ended the war there 12 years ago.

Fifty per cent of Bosnian territory is controlled by Bosnian Serbs.

They might well now unfurl those old maps again, follow Kosovo's example and declare themselves not part of Bosnia at all but - as they once aspired to become - western Serbia.

And that, rather than Kosovo itself, could be the start of a dangerous, and perhaps violent, unravelling.

From Our Own Correspondent was broadcast on Saturday, 8 December, 2007 at 1130 GMT on BBC Radio 4. Please check the programme schedules for World Service transmission times.

2007年4月1日 星期日

FW: Abolish bilingual education, Gingrich urges

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/31/gingrich.bilingual.ap/index.html

Abolish bilingual education, Gingrich urges

-->POSTED: 4:58 p.m. EDT, March 31, 2007
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich equated bilingual education Saturday with "the language of living in a ghetto" and mocked requirements that ballots be printed in multiple languages.
"The government should quit mandating that various documents be printed in any one of 700 languages depending on who randomly shows up" to vote, said Gingrich, who is considering seeking the Republican presidential nomination in 2008. He made the comments in a speech to the National Federation of Republican Women.
"The American people believe English should be the official language of the government. ... We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the common language of the country and they learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in a ghetto," Gingrich said to cheers from the crowd of more than 100.
"Citizenship requires passing a test on American history in English. If that's true, then we do not have to create ballots in any language except English," he said.
Peter Zamora, co-chair of the Washington-based Hispanic Education Coalition, which supports bilingual education, said, "The tone of his comments were very hateful. Spanish is spoken by many individuals who do not live in the ghetto."
He said research has shown "that bilingual education is the best method of teaching English to non-English speakers."
Spanish-speakers, Zamora said, know they need to learn English.
"There's no resistance to learning English, really, among immigrants, among native-born citizens," he said. "Everyone wants to learn English because it's what you need to thrive in this country."
In the past, Gingrich has supported making English the nation's official language. He's also said all American children should learn English and that other languages should be secondary in schools.
In 1995, for example, he said bilingualism poses "long-term dangers to the fabric of our nation" and that "allowing bilingualism to continue to grow is very dangerous."
Bilingual programs teach students reading, arithmetic and other basic skills in their native language so they do not fall behind while mastering English.
On voting, federal law requires districts with large populations of non-English speakers to print ballots in multiple languages.
Copyright 2007 The Associated Press.


----------------
It just a total absurd feeling for me to read an article that has such different point of view toward bilingual education. It is a very biased and not constructive way of saying. ( or at least I hope that he knows what he says)